Trademark appeals

Trademark: PLANT LINE PHYTOTHERAPY Application No.: M-18-1278
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2021/M-18-1276 (AP-2019-12) un RIAP/2021/M-18-1278 (AP-2019-13) Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PLANT LINE Application No.: M-18-1276
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2021/M-18-1276 (AP-2019-12) un RIAP/2021/M-18-1278 (AP-2019-13) Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: mana KAFIJA Application No.: M-19-279
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2021/M-19-278 RIAP/2021/M-19-279 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: mana MAIZE Application No.: M-19-278
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2021/M-19-278 RIAP/2021/M-19-279 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: JŪRMALAS ALUS Application No.: M-19-52
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2021/M-19-52 Nice classes: 21, 32
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SS Application No.: M-19-738
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/M-19-738 Nice classes: 35
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: TĒJU FABRIKA Application No.: M-18-1054
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)4, LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/M-18-1054 Nice classes: 5, 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: FACE ID Application No.: 1397940
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/WO 1 397 940 Nice classes: 9
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Face ID Application No.: 1383986
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/WO 1 383 986 Nice classes: 9
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: AlerGo nasal spray Application No.: M-19-26
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/M-19-26 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: KITCHENCONNECT Application No.: M-18-1946
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/M-18-1946 Nice classes: 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Sporta laboratorija Application No.: M-19-191
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/19-191 Nice classes: 44
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Like fm Application No.: M-18-1190
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)4
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Apelācijas padomes lēmums Nice classes: 38
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Smieklu Joga Application No.: M-18-1298
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)4
Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/M-18-1298 Nice classes: 9, 16, 25, 28, 41
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MORE THAN LAW. Application No.: M-18-1625
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/M-18-1625 Nice classes: 45
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ladyloan Application No.: M-19-79
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Apelācijas padomes lēmums Nice classes: 36
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: CASTEL Application No.: M-16-611
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Apelācijas padomes lēmums Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: AIZDEVUMS.LV Application No.: M-16-666
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Apelācijas padomes lēmums Nice classes: 36
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: IESPĒJA PĀRMAIŅĀM Application No.: M-16-236
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(3)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Apelācijas padomes lēmums Nice classes: 36
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: LAT SECURITY Application No.: M-16-1337
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Apelācijas padomes lēmums Nice classes: 45
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Наш канал Application No.: M-16-155
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Apelācijas padomes lēmums Nice classes: 38, 41
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: CBL Open Pension Fund Application No.: M-14-874
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)8
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2016/M-14-874 Nice classes: 36
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: CBL Life Application No.: M-14-870
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)8
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2016/M-14-870 Nice classes: 36
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: CBL Atklātais pensiju fonds Application No.: M-14-872
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)8
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2016/M-14-872 Nice classes: 36
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Ornaments Application No.: M-09-1370
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/M-09-1370 Nice classes: 3, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 41
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: CATRI Application No.: M-07-1111
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 16.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2008/M-07-1111 Nice classes: 12, 35, 37
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: СЕНСОТЕРАПИЯ Application No.: M-05-1731
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2008/M-05-1731 Nice classes: 3, 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SENSOTERAPIA Application No.: M-05-1730
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2008/M-05-1730 Nice classes: 3, 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ALASKA Application No.: WO 823 013
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2014/WO 823 013 Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Rixcargo.com Application No.: M-11-929
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2012/M-11-929 Nice classes: 35, 39, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Validolum Application No.: M-05-1241
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)4
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2008/M-05-1241 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: NOCTALGIA Application No.: M-11-462
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2013/M-11-462 Nice classes: 29
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: RIX LOGISTICS Application No.: M-10-1460
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2012/M-10-1460 Nice classes: 39
First Instance Court Decision: A420188815 Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SYNTESE Application No.: M-12-632
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2014/M-12-632 Nice classes: 1
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: HEINOLA Jääkairat Made in Finland Application No.: M-12-352
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)8
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2014/M-12-352 Nice classes: 8, 28
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Cilmes šūnu banka Application No.: M-12-666
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2014/M-12-666 Nice classes: 39, 40, 42, 44
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: TRADICIJA Application No.: M-09-992
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2010/M-09-992 Nice classes: 29, 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SNIEDZ SOLĪTO Application No.: M-08-1197
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2010/M-08-1197 Nice classes: 3, 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: IN-CUP Application No.: M-11-455
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2013/M-11-455 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: RIŽSKIJ ZAĻIV (kirilica) Application No.: WO 1 073 139
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2013/WO 1 073 139 Nice classes: 29, 35
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: NATURELLA Application No.: M-03-919
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2009/M-03-919 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: HARD ROCK CAFE Application No.: M-06-1045
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(3)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2008/M-06-1045 Nice classes: 25, 43
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: (etiķete ar Rīgas panorāmas siluetu) Application No.: WO 1 073 138
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2013/WO 1 073 138 Nice classes: 29, 35
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: NEW BUSINESS GENERATION Application No.: WO 942 007
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2009/WO 942 007 Nice classes: 9
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PATIENT SAFE Application No.: WO 1 016 039
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/WO 1 016 039 Nice classes: 10
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: REHAB Application No.: M-11-769
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2013/M-11-769 Nice classes: 5, 30, 32
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Plombir Application No.: M-10-1579
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2012/M-10-1579 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: TURONČIKI (kirilica) Application No.: WO 1 063 796
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2013/WO 1 063 796 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: HOME MARKET Application No.: WO 921 697
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/WO 921 697 Nice classes: 4, 11, 20, 21, 24, 26, 27, 28
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: HOME MARKET Application No.: WO 963 464
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/WO 963 464 Nice classes: 19
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: pet center Application No.: WO 1 038 475
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2012/WO 1 038 475 Nice classes: 31, 35, 44
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ANTITUSIN (kirilica) ANTITUSSIN Application No.: WO 988 201
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/WO 988 201 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PURESEA Application No.: M-08-1809
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/M-08-1809 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: A420621811 (ApP lēmums atcelts) Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Ideal-Fit Application No.: WO 1 038 183
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/WO 1 038 183 Nice classes: 5, 10
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Fitch Application No.: M-11-210
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2012/M-11-210 Nice classes: 18, 35
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PETRUSHKA Application No.: M-11-796
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2012/M-11-796 Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: LAIMĒTAVA Application No.: M-09-1225
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)4
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/M-09-1225 Nice classes: 41
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: 28BLACK Application No.: WO 1 033 667
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/WO 1 033 667 Nice classes: 25
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: 28RED Application No.: WO 1 026 734
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/WO 1 026 734 Nice classes: 25
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: KASTAŅU Application No.: M-10-125
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/M-10-125 Nice classes: 32
First Instance Court Decision: A420394812 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: EUROGIPS Application No.: M-06-696
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/M-06-696 Nice classes: 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 17, 19, 20
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: VALSTS Application No.: M-08-82
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)6, LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2010/M-08-82 Nice classes: 16
First Instance Court Decision: A420579411 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision: A420579411 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā)
Trademark: GASTRONOM žurnal dļa teh, kto jest (kirilica) Application No.: M-05-157
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/M-05-157 Nice classes: 35, 40, 41, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ŠKOLA GASTRONOMA žurnal dļa teh, kto ļubit gotovit (kirilica) Application No.: M-05-158
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/M-05-158 Nice classes: 35, 40, 41, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SADOVŅIK (kirilica) Application No.: M-05-156
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/M-05-156 Nice classes: 16, 35, 40, 41, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: RYE HONEY Application No.: WO 828 519
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2007/WO 828 519 Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SUISS Application No.: WO 712 220
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/WO 712 220 Nice classes: 32
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: TRUCKS YOU CAN TRUST Application No.: WO 840 722
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/WO 840 722 Nice classes: 12, 14, 16, 18, 25, 28, 36, 37
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Sovetskoje (kirilica) Application No.: WO 834 602
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/WO 834 602 Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MASTERLEASE Application No.: M-05-1190
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2007/M-05-1190 Nice classes: 36, 39
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: LAIMĒTAVA Application No.: M-06-1344
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2008/M-06-1344 Nice classes: 41
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Aroma Application No.: M-97-2183
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 17.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2007/M 40 151 Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: REACH DUAL EFFECT Application No.: M-03-1596
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/M-03-1596 Nice classes: 21
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: NEO Application No.: WO 806 901
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2005/WO 806 901 Nice classes: 29, 30, 32
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SUPER BOND Application No.: M-05-83
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/M-05-83 Nice classes: 1, 16
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: CHROMDIET Application No.: WO 739 649
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2005/WO 739 649 Nice classes: 5, 29, 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SN SYMBOLE NATIONAL Application No.: M-05-1597
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/M-05-1597 Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: LAIMĒTAVA Application No.: M-05-296
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/M-05-296 Nice classes: 41
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: TELEKOM GLOBAL NET Application No.: WO 808 520
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2005/WO 808 520 Nice classes: 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: selected Application No.: M-02-1731
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(3)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/M-02-1731 Nice classes: 9, 14, 18, 25
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SELECTED Application No.: M-02-1561
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(3)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/M-02-1561 Nice classes: 9, 14, 18, 25
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: (Pudele) Application No.: M-03-766
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/M-03-766 Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PRIMI PIATTI D`ITALIA Application No.: WO 620 874
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2005/WO 620 874 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: OLA Application No.: WO 806 616
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/WO 806 616 Nice classes: 29, 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: TRIKĀTAS ROKFORAS SIERS Application No.: M-01-1015
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/M-01-1015 Nice classes: 29
First Instance Court Decision: A2787-05/2/41966 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SHAVE 20 PLUS Application No.: WO 733 616
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/ WO 733 616 Nice classes: 8
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SENO LAIKU DZĒRIENS Application No.: M-02-132
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/ M-02-132 Nice classes: 32
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: IN THE SUN Application No.: WO 787 214
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/ WO 787 214 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SAINT GEORGE Application No.: M-01-1186
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)6, LPZ/99 6.(1)9
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/ M-01-1186 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: KAGOR (kirilica) Application No.: M-99-1851
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)6, LPZ/99 6.(1)9
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2001/M-99-1851 Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: KAGOR (kirilica) Application No.: M-99-1847
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)6, LPZ/99 6.(1)9
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2001/M-99-1847 Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: CLASSIC Application No.: WO 213 635
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)4, LPZ/99 6.(3)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/ WO 2R 213 635 Nice classes: 29, 30
First Instance Court Decision: A42178404 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: TESTOGEL Application No.: M-02-168
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2003/M-02-168 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ANDROGEL Application No.: M-02-167
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2003/M-02-167 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SKIN Application No.: WO 779 243
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2003/WO 779 243 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Sofija (kirilica) Application No.: M-93-9078
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-9078 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MOSKOVSKAJA (kirilica) Application No.: M-97-2240
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-97-2240 Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BALTIJA (kirilica) Application No.: M-95-610
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/M-95-610 Nice classes: 16, 35, 39, 41, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ZÜRICH FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP Application No.: WO 693 627
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 7.(4), LPZ/99 13.(8), LPZ/99 14.(4), LPZ/99 22.(2), LPZ/99 37.(1)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 693 627 Nice classes:
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ZURICH FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP Application No.: WO 693 626
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 7.(4), LPZ/99 13.(8), LPZ/99 14.(4), LPZ/99 22.(2), LPZ/99 37.(1)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 693 626 Nice classes:
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ZURICH FINANCIAL SERVICES Application No.: WO 696 296
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 7.(4), LPZ/99 13.(8), LPZ/99 14.(4), LPZ/99 22.(2), LPZ/99 37.(1)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 696 296 Nice classes:
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: VIENNA Finest Quality Application No.: M-92-567
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-567 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: VENICE BEACH Application No.: WO 717 798
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 717 798 Nice classes: 3, 14, 18, 24
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: US BASIC Application No.: WO 630 158
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2003/WO 630 158 Nice classes: 18, 25
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ULTRA Application No.: M-92-562
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-562 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: TOWN CAR Application No.: M-97-1586
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/M-97-1586 Nice classes: 12
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: THE FASTEST WAY TO SEND MONEY Application No.: M-93-4001
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/M-93-4001 Nice classes: 36, 38
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Tele Plus Application No.: WO 748 978
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/WO 748 978 Nice classes: 38
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Tele 2 Application No.: WO 659 733
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/WO 659 733 Nice classes: 38
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: TCP Application No.: M-93-16
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-16 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: STALINSKAYA Application No.: WO 692 450
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)8
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 692 450 Nice classes: 33, 35, 39
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SPECIAL Application No.: M-92-3895
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-3895 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SNS Application No.: M-93-2762
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2762 Nice classes: 9, 18, 25, 28
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Sheba – lai izteiktu savu mīlestību Application No.: M-94-131
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 6.(5)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-94-131 Nice classes: 31
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SHEBA Application No.: M-94-109
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 6.(5)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-94-109 Nice classes: 31
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SCM Application No.: M-92-2632
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2632 Nice classes: 1, 2
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SCIENTOLOGY Application No.: M-93-2769
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2769 Nice classes: 16, 41, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SAVOY Application No.: M-92-553
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-553 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: SALIN Application No.: M-98-244
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-98-244 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Sale Application No.: WO 743 080
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)4
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/WO 743 080 Nice classes: 16, 29, 30, 35
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: RICHMOND Application No.: M-92-564
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-564 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: REVAL Golden Blend Application No.: M-93-2231
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2231 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: REVAL Application No.: M-93-2233
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2233 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: RECOLOR Application No.: WO 673 451
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 673 451 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: RALEIGH Application No.: M-93-2312
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2312 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: RAGU' Application No.: M-95-1042
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/M-95-1042 Nice classes: 29, 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: RADO FLORENCE Application No.: WO 609 722
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/WO 609 722 Nice classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PURE VIRGINIA NELSON Application No.: M-93-721
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-721 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PrintHouse Application No.: M-00-1267
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/M-00-1267 Nice classes: 16, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PRINCE OF WALES Application No.: M-92-2522
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(1)8, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2522 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PRADA MILANO 1913 Application No.: WO 662 397
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 662 397 Nice classes: 3, 5, 9, 14, 18, 24, 25
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PRADA MILANO Application No.: WO 661 532
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 661 532 Nice classes: 3, 5, 9, 14, 18, 24, 25
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PPK Application No.: WO 636 310
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 636 310 Nice classes: 13
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PP Application No.: WO 636 311
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 636 311 Nice classes: 13
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: POLY KUR Application No.: M-92-829
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-829 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: POLY COLOR EASY COLOR Application No.: M-92-825
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-825 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: POLY COLOR Application No.: M-92-828
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-828 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PERFECT Application No.: WO 632 835
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 632 835 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PAU Application No.: M-92-5637
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-5637 Nice classes: 5, 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PARADIS Application No.: M-92-2053
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)8
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2053 Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: PALERMO Application No.: WO 751 320
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/WO 751 320 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: OL-AMINE OL-AMIN (kirilica) Application No.: M-93-8314
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-8314 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: No A līdz pat Zn Application No.: M-00-546
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/M-00-546 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: NEW ZEALAND MILK PRODUCTS Application No.: M-93-8960
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-8960 Nice classes: 29
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: NEW ZEALAND MILK Application No.: M-98-1387
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-98-1387 Nice classes: 29
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: NEVADA Application No.: WO 652 001
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/WO 652 001 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: NEUTROMED Application No.: M-92-813
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-813 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: NEUTRODERM Application No.: M-92-814
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-814 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: NETTO Application No.: M-92-4185
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-4185 Nice classes: 3, 29, 30, 31, 32
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: NERVAL Application No.: M-92-791
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-791 Nice classes: 3, 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: NATURELLE Application No.: M-92-827
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-827 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: NATIONAL Application No.: M-93-739
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(4)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-739 Nice classes: 7, 9, 11
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: national Application No.: M-93-727
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(4)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-93-727 Nice classes: 8, 10, 14, 16
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: mtv Application No.: M-94-97
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)10, PK 6.bis
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/M-94-97 Nice classes: 35, 41
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MOSKOVSKAYA Application No.: M-97-2242
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-97-2242 Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MOSKOVSKAJA Application No.: M-97-2241
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-97-2241 Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MONTAŃA Application No.: M-93-8473
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-8473 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MONTANA Application No.: M-93-2315
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-2315 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MONTANA Application No.: M-93-7508
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-7508 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: C-1107/2/1998 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MIX25 Application No.: M-99-880
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2001/M-99-880 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MISTERS VENTSPILS Application No.: M-97-1600
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/M-97-1600 Nice classes: 35, 41
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MIS VENTSPILS Application No.: M-97-1599
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/M-97-1599 Nice classes: 35, 41
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MINDEN Application No.: M-92-575
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-575 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MILANA Application No.: M-97-2477
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/M-97-2477 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: C-1411/2/1999 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MILANA Application No.: WO 633 631
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 633 631 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Microfibres Application No.: M-97-1077
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/M-97-1077 Nice classes: 24
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MICROFIBRES Application No.: M-97-1076
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/M-97-1076 Nice classes: 24
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: METAXA Application No.: M-92-73
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-92-73 Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MARK-UP Application No.: M-98-405
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-98-405 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MANHATTAN ICE-DREAM Application No.: WO 657 020
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/WO 657 020 Nice classes: 29, 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: MANHATTAN Application No.: WO 683 362
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: APP/1999/WO 683 362 Nice classes: 29, 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: LONDON BRIDGE Application No.: M-93-1247
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-1247 Nice classes: 8
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: LNK Application No.: M-92-1528
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-1528 Nice classes: 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: LIPIDIOSE Application No.: WO 702 546
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 702 546 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: LEUKOPLAST Application No.: M-92-2165
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2165 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: LENINGRAD COWBOY BEER PIVO (kirilica) CERVEZA Application No.: M-93-951
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-951 Nice classes: 32
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: LC-65-N Application No.: M-93-1680
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-1680 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: LAURA BIAGIOTTI ROMA Application No.: M-92-1494
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-1494 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: LA PAZ Application No.: M-94-2251
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-94-2251 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: L & B Application No.: M-92-1217
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-1217 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: KIRIN Application No.: WO 729 989
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2001/WO 729 989 Nice classes: 32
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: KINDER Application No.: WO 659 768
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 659 768 Nice classes: 28
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: JAGUAR Application No.: M-92-1104
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)10
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-92-1104 Nice classes: 12
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: JAGUAR Application No.: M-92-1103
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)10
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-92-1103 Nice classes: 12
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: JAGUAR Application No.: M-92-1102
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)10
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-92-1102 Nice classes: 12
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: JAGUAR Application No.: M-92-1101
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)10
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-92-1101 Nice classes: 12
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: INTERSPORT Application No.: WO 610 368
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/WO 610 368 Nice classes: 41
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: INTERNET WORLD Application No.: M-96-1427
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-96-1427 Nice classes: 16, 35, 41, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: INTERNET KLUBS Application No.: M-96-1454
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/M-96-1454 Nice classes: 16, 35, 38, 41
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: INDOOR Application No.: WO 732 680
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/WO 732 680 Nice classes: 11, 20, 21, 24, 27, 35
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: hollywood ROCK Application No.: M-94-2216
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-94-2216 Nice classes: 38, 41
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: HOLLYWOOD LIGHTS Application No.: M-93-2319
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2319 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: HOLLYWOOD CHEWING GUM Application No.: WO 488 792
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 488 792 Nice classes: 3, 4, 12, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 33, 34, 38, 41, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: HOLLYWOOD Application No.: M-92-1077
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-1077 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: hollywood Application No.: M-92-1076
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-1076 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: HOHES C Application No.: WO 653 247
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 653 247 Nice classes: 29, 30, 32
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: GOTIŅA Application No.: M-97-1976
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/ M-97-1976 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: GORI Application No.: M-93-94
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-94 Nice classes: 1, 2, 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Generating Power – Transmitting Possibilities Application No.: WO 747 903
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)4, LPZ/99 6.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/WO 747 903 Nice classes: 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: FRAGILE Application No.: WO 707 245
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2001/WO 707 245 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: FLORIDA Application No.: M-92-580
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-580 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: FILET-O-FISH Application No.: M-92-1777
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-1777 Nice classes: 29, 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: FAIRFAX Application No.: M-92-582
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-582 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: EURO ACTIV Application No.: WO 634 822
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 634 822 Nice classes: 1, 9, 16, 37, 40, 41, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ENTERPRISE Application No.: M-93-8149
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/M-93-8149 Nice classes: 39, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: e Enterprise Application No.: M-95-1481
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-95-1481 Nice classes: 12, 35, 37, 39
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ELIDA HAIR INSTITUTE PARIS Application No.: WO 650 313
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/WO 650 313 Nice classes: 3, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: EDELSTOFF Application No.: M-92-2338
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-2338 Nice classes: 32
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Diascope Application No.: WO 763 273
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2003/WO 763 273 Nice classes: 9
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: DIANETICS Application No.: M-93-2767
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2767 Nice classes: 16, 41, 42
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: DENVER Application No.: M-93-2314
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2314 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: DENVER Application No.: M-92-581
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-581 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: DALLAS Application No.: WO 634 805
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/WO 634 805 Nice classes: 25
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Creme 21 Application No.: M-92-789
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-789 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: CONFISERIE Application No.: M-98-1799
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-98-1799 Nice classes: 29
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: COMMERZBANK Application No.: WO 560 141
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 560 141 Nice classes: 36
First Instance Court Decision: C-1123/2/1997 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision: PAC-477/1997 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā)
Trademark: CLASSIC Application No.: M-00-282
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/M-00-282 Nice classes: 6, 9
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: CAPRI Application No.: M-92-1071
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-1071 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: CANALSATELLITE Application No.: WO 661 865
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/WO 661 865 Nice classes: 9, 16, 38, 41
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Butter Blend Application No.: M-93-7502
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-7502 Nice classes: 29
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Buffalo Application No.: WO 669 747
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 669 747 Nice classes: 25
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BROOKLYN Chewing Gum Gustolungo Application No.: WO 633 971
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 633 971 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BROOKLYN BY PERFETTI MADE IN ITALY Application No.: M-92-2400
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2400 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BROOKLYN Application No.: M-92-2399
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2399 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BROOKFIELD Application No.: M-92-4248
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-4248 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BOSTON Application No.: M-92-570
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-570 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BORKUM RIFF Application No.: M-92-594
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-594 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BOHEMIAN Application No.: M-93-2309
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2309 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BOHEMIA BRAND BEER Application No.: M-93-1585
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-1585 Nice classes: 32
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BOHEMIA Application No.: M-93-1582
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-1582 Nice classes: 32
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BLEND OF SWEDEN Application No.: M-92-915
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-915 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BIG DUTCHMAN Application No.: M-92-2341
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-2341 Nice classes: 6, 7, 9, 11, 19, 20, 21
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BEST-HALL Application No.: M-96-1202
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-96-1202 Nice classes: 6, 19
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BERLINE Application No.: WO 665 816
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 665 816 Nice classes: 18
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BELMONT Application No.: M-93-2313
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2313 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BALTIC PULP Application No.: WO 743 073
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/WO 743 073 Nice classes: 1
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: BACTERIOSTAT Application No.: M-97-2226
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)7
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-97-2226 Nice classes: 1, 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: Australian by L'ALPINA Application No.: WO 580 742
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 580 742 Nice classes: 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 24, 25, 28
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ASPIRIN Application No.: M-93-2217
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-2217 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: C-1176/2/1998 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision: PAC-14/1999 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā)
Trademark: ASPIRIN Application No.: M-93-2216
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-2216 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: C-1176/2/1998 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision: PAC-14/1999 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā)
Trademark: ARIZONA Application No.: WO 669 646
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 669 646 Nice classes: 12
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: AOK Application No.: M-92-790
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-790 Nice classes: 3, 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ANTIFLU Application No.: M-98-248
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-98-248 Nice classes: 5
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ALPEN Application No.: M-93-7995
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-7995 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ADRIA EXPORT Application No.: M-92-4245
Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2)
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-4245 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ACTIV Application No.: M-92-835
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-835 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: ABC Application No.: M-92-2163
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2163 Nice classes: 5, 10
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: 8 X 4 Application No.: M-92-2161
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2161 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: 1001 Application No.: M-93-2785
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2785 Nice classes: 3
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: (taisnstūris ar slīpām svītrām) Application No.: M-92-536
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-536 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: C-1366/2/1996 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision: PAC-103/1997 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā)
Trademark: (rāmis ar nošķeltiem stūriem) Application No.: WO 704 859
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 704 859 Nice classes: 9, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 28, 30
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: (rāmis ar nošķeltiem stūriem) Application No.: WO 701 461
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 701 461 Nice classes: 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: (līkne) Application No.: WO 632 345
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 632 345 Nice classes: 33
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: (čaulīte) Application No.: WO 637 409
Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2001/WO 637 409 Nice classes: 30
First Instance Court Decision: C-1564/2/2002 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision:
Trademark: (cigarešu kārbiņa) Application No.: WO 688 990
Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1
Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 688 990 Nice classes: 16, 34
First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision: