Trademark: PLANT LINE PHYTOTHERAPY Application No.: M-18-1278 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2021/M-18-1276 (AP-2019-12) un RIAP/2021/M-18-1278 (AP-2019-13) Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PLANT LINE Application No.: M-18-1276 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2021/M-18-1276 (AP-2019-12) un RIAP/2021/M-18-1278 (AP-2019-13) Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: mana KAFIJA Application No.: M-19-279 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2021/M-19-278 RIAP/2021/M-19-279 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: mana MAIZE Application No.: M-19-278 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2021/M-19-278 RIAP/2021/M-19-279 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: JŪRMALAS ALUS Application No.: M-19-52 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2021/M-19-52 Nice classes: 21, 32 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SS Application No.: M-19-738 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/M-19-738 Nice classes: 35 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: TĒJU FABRIKA Application No.: M-18-1054 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)4, LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/M-18-1054 Nice classes: 5, 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: FACE ID Application No.: 1397940 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/WO 1 397 940 Nice classes: 9 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Face ID Application No.: 1383986 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/WO 1 383 986 Nice classes: 9 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: AlerGo nasal spray Application No.: M-19-26 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/M-19-26 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: KITCHENCONNECT Application No.: M-18-1946 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/M-18-1946 Nice classes: 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Sporta laboratorija Application No.: M-19-191 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/19-191 Nice classes: 44 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Like fm Application No.: M-18-1190 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)4 Decision of the Board of Appeal: Apelācijas padomes lēmums Nice classes: 38 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Smieklu Joga Application No.: M-18-1298 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)4 Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/M-18-1298 Nice classes: 9, 16, 25, 28, 41 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MORE THAN LAW. Application No.: M-18-1625 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: RIAP/2020/M-18-1625 Nice classes: 45 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ladyloan Application No.: M-19-79 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: Apelācijas padomes lēmums Nice classes: 36 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: CASTEL Application No.: M-16-611 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: Apelācijas padomes lēmums Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: AIZDEVUMS.LV Application No.: M-16-666 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: Apelācijas padomes lēmums Nice classes: 36 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: IESPĒJA PĀRMAIŅĀM Application No.: M-16-236 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(3) Decision of the Board of Appeal: Apelācijas padomes lēmums Nice classes: 36 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: LAT SECURITY Application No.: M-16-1337 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: Apelācijas padomes lēmums Nice classes: 45 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Наш канал Application No.: M-16-155 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: Apelācijas padomes lēmums Nice classes: 38, 41 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: CBL Open Pension Fund Application No.: M-14-874 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)8 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2016/M-14-874 Nice classes: 36 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: CBL Life Application No.: M-14-870 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)8 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2016/M-14-870 Nice classes: 36 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: CBL Atklātais pensiju fonds Application No.: M-14-872 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)8 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2016/M-14-872 Nice classes: 36 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Ornaments Application No.: M-09-1370 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/M-09-1370 Nice classes: 3, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 41 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: CATRI Application No.: M-07-1111 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 16.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2008/M-07-1111 Nice classes: 12, 35, 37 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: СЕНСОТЕРАПИЯ Application No.: M-05-1731 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2008/M-05-1731 Nice classes: 3, 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SENSOTERAPIA Application No.: M-05-1730 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2008/M-05-1730 Nice classes: 3, 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ALASKA Application No.: WO 823 013 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2014/WO 823 013 Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Rixcargo.com Application No.: M-11-929 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2012/M-11-929 Nice classes: 35, 39, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Validolum Application No.: M-05-1241 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)4 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2008/M-05-1241 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: NOCTALGIA Application No.: M-11-462 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2013/M-11-462 Nice classes: 29 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: RIX LOGISTICS Application No.: M-10-1460 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2012/M-10-1460 Nice classes: 39 First Instance Court Decision: A420188815 Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SYNTESE Application No.: M-12-632 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2014/M-12-632 Nice classes: 1 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: HEINOLA Jääkairat Made in Finland Application No.: M-12-352 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)8 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2014/M-12-352 Nice classes: 8, 28 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Cilmes šūnu banka Application No.: M-12-666 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2014/M-12-666 Nice classes: 39, 40, 42, 44 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: TRADICIJA Application No.: M-09-992 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2010/M-09-992 Nice classes: 29, 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SNIEDZ SOLĪTO Application No.: M-08-1197 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2010/M-08-1197 Nice classes: 3, 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: IN-CUP Application No.: M-11-455 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2013/M-11-455 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: RIŽSKIJ ZAĻIV (kirilica) Application No.: WO 1 073 139 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2013/WO 1 073 139 Nice classes: 29, 35 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: NATURELLA Application No.: M-03-919 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2009/M-03-919 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: HARD ROCK CAFE Application No.: M-06-1045 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(3) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2008/M-06-1045 Nice classes: 25, 43 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: (etiķete ar Rīgas panorāmas siluetu) Application No.: WO 1 073 138 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2013/WO 1 073 138 Nice classes: 29, 35 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: NEW BUSINESS GENERATION Application No.: WO 942 007 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2009/WO 942 007 Nice classes: 9 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PATIENT SAFE Application No.: WO 1 016 039 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/WO 1 016 039 Nice classes: 10 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: REHAB Application No.: M-11-769 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2013/M-11-769 Nice classes: 5, 30, 32 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Plombir Application No.: M-10-1579 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2012/M-10-1579 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: TURONČIKI (kirilica) Application No.: WO 1 063 796 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2013/WO 1 063 796 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: HOME MARKET Application No.: WO 921 697 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/WO 921 697 Nice classes: 4, 11, 20, 21, 24, 26, 27, 28 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: HOME MARKET Application No.: WO 963 464 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/WO 963 464 Nice classes: 19 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: pet center Application No.: WO 1 038 475 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2012/WO 1 038 475 Nice classes: 31, 35, 44 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ANTITUSIN (kirilica) ANTITUSSIN Application No.: WO 988 201 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/WO 988 201 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PURESEA Application No.: M-08-1809 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/M-08-1809 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: A420621811 (ApP lēmums atcelts) Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Ideal-Fit Application No.: WO 1 038 183 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/WO 1 038 183 Nice classes: 5, 10 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Fitch Application No.: M-11-210 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2012/M-11-210 Nice classes: 18, 35 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PETRUSHKA Application No.: M-11-796 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2012/M-11-796 Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: LAIMĒTAVA Application No.: M-09-1225 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)4 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/M-09-1225 Nice classes: 41 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: 28BLACK Application No.: WO 1 033 667 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/WO 1 033 667 Nice classes: 25 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: 28RED Application No.: WO 1 026 734 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/WO 1 026 734 Nice classes: 25 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: KASTAŅU Application No.: M-10-125 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/M-10-125 Nice classes: 32 First Instance Court Decision: A420394812 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: EUROGIPS Application No.: M-06-696 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2011/M-06-696 Nice classes: 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 17, 19, 20 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: VALSTS Application No.: M-08-82 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)6, LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2010/M-08-82 Nice classes: 16 First Instance Court Decision: A420579411 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision: A420579411 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā)

Trademark: GASTRONOM žurnal dļa teh, kto jest (kirilica) Application No.: M-05-157 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/M-05-157 Nice classes: 35, 40, 41, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ŠKOLA GASTRONOMA žurnal dļa teh, kto ļubit gotovit (kirilica) Application No.: M-05-158 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/M-05-158 Nice classes: 35, 40, 41, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SADOVŅIK (kirilica) Application No.: M-05-156 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/M-05-156 Nice classes: 16, 35, 40, 41, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: RYE HONEY Application No.: WO 828 519 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2007/WO 828 519 Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SUISS Application No.: WO 712 220 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/WO 712 220 Nice classes: 32 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: TRUCKS YOU CAN TRUST Application No.: WO 840 722 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/WO 840 722 Nice classes: 12, 14, 16, 18, 25, 28, 36, 37 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Sovetskoje (kirilica) Application No.: WO 834 602 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/WO 834 602 Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MASTERLEASE Application No.: M-05-1190 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2007/M-05-1190 Nice classes: 36, 39 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: LAIMĒTAVA Application No.: M-06-1344 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2008/M-06-1344 Nice classes: 41 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Aroma Application No.: M-97-2183 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 17.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2007/M 40 151 Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: REACH DUAL EFFECT Application No.: M-03-1596 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/M-03-1596 Nice classes: 21 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: NEO Application No.: WO 806 901 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2005/WO 806 901 Nice classes: 29, 30, 32 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SUPER BOND Application No.: M-05-83 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/M-05-83 Nice classes: 1, 16 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: CHROMDIET Application No.: WO 739 649 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2005/WO 739 649 Nice classes: 5, 29, 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SN SYMBOLE NATIONAL Application No.: M-05-1597 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/M-05-1597 Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: LAIMĒTAVA Application No.: M-05-296 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2006/M-05-296 Nice classes: 41 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: TELEKOM GLOBAL NET Application No.: WO 808 520 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2005/WO 808 520 Nice classes: 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: selected Application No.: M-02-1731 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(3) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/M-02-1731 Nice classes: 9, 14, 18, 25 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SELECTED Application No.: M-02-1561 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(3) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/M-02-1561 Nice classes: 9, 14, 18, 25 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: (Pudele) Application No.: M-03-766 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/M-03-766 Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PRIMI PIATTI D`ITALIA Application No.: WO 620 874 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2005/WO 620 874 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: OLA Application No.: WO 806 616 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/WO 806 616 Nice classes: 29, 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: TRIKĀTAS ROKFORAS SIERS Application No.: M-01-1015 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/M-01-1015 Nice classes: 29 First Instance Court Decision: A2787-05/2/41966 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SHAVE 20 PLUS Application No.: WO 733 616 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/ WO 733 616 Nice classes: 8 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SENO LAIKU DZĒRIENS Application No.: M-02-132 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/ M-02-132 Nice classes: 32 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: IN THE SUN Application No.: WO 787 214 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/ WO 787 214 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SAINT GEORGE Application No.: M-01-1186 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)6, LPZ/99 6.(1)9 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/ M-01-1186 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: KAGOR (kirilica) Application No.: M-99-1851 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)6, LPZ/99 6.(1)9 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2001/M-99-1851 Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: KAGOR (kirilica) Application No.: M-99-1847 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)6, LPZ/99 6.(1)9 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2001/M-99-1847 Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: CLASSIC Application No.: WO 213 635 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)4, LPZ/99 6.(3) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2004/ WO 2R 213 635 Nice classes: 29, 30 First Instance Court Decision: A42178404 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: TESTOGEL Application No.: M-02-168 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2003/M-02-168 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ANDROGEL Application No.: M-02-167 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2003/M-02-167 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SKIN Application No.: WO 779 243 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2003/WO 779 243 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Sofija (kirilica) Application No.: M-93-9078 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-9078 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MOSKOVSKAJA (kirilica) Application No.: M-97-2240 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-97-2240 Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BALTIJA (kirilica) Application No.: M-95-610 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/M-95-610 Nice classes: 16, 35, 39, 41, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ZÜRICH FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP Application No.: WO 693 627 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 7.(4), LPZ/99 13.(8), LPZ/99 14.(4), LPZ/99 22.(2), LPZ/99 37.(1) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 693 627 Nice classes: First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ZURICH FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP Application No.: WO 693 626 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 7.(4), LPZ/99 13.(8), LPZ/99 14.(4), LPZ/99 22.(2), LPZ/99 37.(1) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 693 626 Nice classes: First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ZURICH FINANCIAL SERVICES Application No.: WO 696 296 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 7.(4), LPZ/99 13.(8), LPZ/99 14.(4), LPZ/99 22.(2), LPZ/99 37.(1) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 696 296 Nice classes: First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: VIENNA Finest Quality Application No.: M-92-567 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-567 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: VENICE BEACH Application No.: WO 717 798 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 717 798 Nice classes: 3, 14, 18, 24 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: US BASIC Application No.: WO 630 158 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2003/WO 630 158 Nice classes: 18, 25 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ULTRA Application No.: M-92-562 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-562 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: TOWN CAR Application No.: M-97-1586 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/M-97-1586 Nice classes: 12 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: THE FASTEST WAY TO SEND MONEY Application No.: M-93-4001 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/M-93-4001 Nice classes: 36, 38 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Tele Plus Application No.: WO 748 978 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/WO 748 978 Nice classes: 38 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Tele 2 Application No.: WO 659 733 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/WO 659 733 Nice classes: 38 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: TCP Application No.: M-93-16 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-16 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: STALINSKAYA Application No.: WO 692 450 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)8 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 692 450 Nice classes: 33, 35, 39 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SPECIAL Application No.: M-92-3895 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-3895 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SNS Application No.: M-93-2762 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2762 Nice classes: 9, 18, 25, 28 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Sheba – lai izteiktu savu mīlestību Application No.: M-94-131 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 6.(5) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-94-131 Nice classes: 31 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SHEBA Application No.: M-94-109 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 6.(5) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-94-109 Nice classes: 31 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SCM Application No.: M-92-2632 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2632 Nice classes: 1, 2 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SCIENTOLOGY Application No.: M-93-2769 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2769 Nice classes: 16, 41, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SAVOY Application No.: M-92-553 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-553 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: SALIN Application No.: M-98-244 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-98-244 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Sale Application No.: WO 743 080 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)4 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/WO 743 080 Nice classes: 16, 29, 30, 35 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: RICHMOND Application No.: M-92-564 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-564 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: REVAL Golden Blend Application No.: M-93-2231 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2231 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: REVAL Application No.: M-93-2233 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2233 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: RECOLOR Application No.: WO 673 451 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 673 451 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: RALEIGH Application No.: M-93-2312 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2312 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: RAGU' Application No.: M-95-1042 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/M-95-1042 Nice classes: 29, 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: RADO FLORENCE Application No.: WO 609 722 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/WO 609 722 Nice classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PURE VIRGINIA NELSON Application No.: M-93-721 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-721 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PrintHouse Application No.: M-00-1267 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/M-00-1267 Nice classes: 16, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PRINCE OF WALES Application No.: M-92-2522 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(1)8, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2522 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PRADA MILANO 1913 Application No.: WO 662 397 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 662 397 Nice classes: 3, 5, 9, 14, 18, 24, 25 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PRADA MILANO Application No.: WO 661 532 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 661 532 Nice classes: 3, 5, 9, 14, 18, 24, 25 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PPK Application No.: WO 636 310 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 636 310 Nice classes: 13 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PP Application No.: WO 636 311 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 636 311 Nice classes: 13 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: POLY KUR Application No.: M-92-829 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-829 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: POLY COLOR EASY COLOR Application No.: M-92-825 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-825 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: POLY COLOR Application No.: M-92-828 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-828 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PERFECT Application No.: WO 632 835 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 632 835 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PAU Application No.: M-92-5637 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-5637 Nice classes: 5, 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PARADIS Application No.: M-92-2053 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)8 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2053 Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: PALERMO Application No.: WO 751 320 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/WO 751 320 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: OL-AMINE OL-AMIN (kirilica) Application No.: M-93-8314 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-8314 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: No A līdz pat Zn Application No.: M-00-546 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/M-00-546 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: NEW ZEALAND MILK PRODUCTS Application No.: M-93-8960 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-8960 Nice classes: 29 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: NEW ZEALAND MILK Application No.: M-98-1387 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-98-1387 Nice classes: 29 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: NEVADA Application No.: WO 652 001 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/WO 652 001 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: NEUTROMED Application No.: M-92-813 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-813 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: NEUTRODERM Application No.: M-92-814 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-814 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: NETTO Application No.: M-92-4185 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-4185 Nice classes: 3, 29, 30, 31, 32 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: NERVAL Application No.: M-92-791 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-791 Nice classes: 3, 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: NATURELLE Application No.: M-92-827 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-827 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: NATIONAL Application No.: M-93-739 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(4) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-739 Nice classes: 7, 9, 11 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: national Application No.: M-93-727 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(4) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-93-727 Nice classes: 8, 10, 14, 16 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: mtv Application No.: M-94-97 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)10, PK 6.bis Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/M-94-97 Nice classes: 35, 41 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MOSKOVSKAYA Application No.: M-97-2242 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-97-2242 Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MOSKOVSKAJA Application No.: M-97-2241 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-97-2241 Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MONTAŃA Application No.: M-93-8473 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-8473 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MONTANA Application No.: M-93-2315 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-2315 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MONTANA Application No.: M-93-7508 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-7508 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: C-1107/2/1998 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MIX25 Application No.: M-99-880 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2001/M-99-880 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MISTERS VENTSPILS Application No.: M-97-1600 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/M-97-1600 Nice classes: 35, 41 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MIS VENTSPILS Application No.: M-97-1599 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/M-97-1599 Nice classes: 35, 41 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MINDEN Application No.: M-92-575 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-575 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MILANA Application No.: M-97-2477 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/M-97-2477 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: C-1411/2/1999 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MILANA Application No.: WO 633 631 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 633 631 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Microfibres Application No.: M-97-1077 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/M-97-1077 Nice classes: 24 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MICROFIBRES Application No.: M-97-1076 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/M-97-1076 Nice classes: 24 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: METAXA Application No.: M-92-73 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-92-73 Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MARK-UP Application No.: M-98-405 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-98-405 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MANHATTAN ICE-DREAM Application No.: WO 657 020 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/WO 657 020 Nice classes: 29, 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: MANHATTAN Application No.: WO 683 362 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: APP/1999/WO 683 362 Nice classes: 29, 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: LONDON BRIDGE Application No.: M-93-1247 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-1247 Nice classes: 8 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: LNK Application No.: M-92-1528 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-1528 Nice classes: 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: LIPIDIOSE Application No.: WO 702 546 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 702 546 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: LEUKOPLAST Application No.: M-92-2165 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2165 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: LENINGRAD COWBOY BEER PIVO (kirilica) CERVEZA Application No.: M-93-951 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-951 Nice classes: 32 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: LC-65-N Application No.: M-93-1680 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-1680 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: LAURA BIAGIOTTI ROMA Application No.: M-92-1494 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-1494 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: LA PAZ Application No.: M-94-2251 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-94-2251 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: L & B Application No.: M-92-1217 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-1217 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: KIRIN Application No.: WO 729 989 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2001/WO 729 989 Nice classes: 32 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: KINDER Application No.: WO 659 768 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 659 768 Nice classes: 28 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: JAGUAR Application No.: M-92-1104 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)10 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-92-1104 Nice classes: 12 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: JAGUAR Application No.: M-92-1103 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)10 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-92-1103 Nice classes: 12 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: JAGUAR Application No.: M-92-1102 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)10 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-92-1102 Nice classes: 12 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: JAGUAR Application No.: M-92-1101 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)10 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-92-1101 Nice classes: 12 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: INTERSPORT Application No.: WO 610 368 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/WO 610 368 Nice classes: 41 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: INTERNET WORLD Application No.: M-96-1427 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-96-1427 Nice classes: 16, 35, 41, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: INTERNET KLUBS Application No.: M-96-1454 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/M-96-1454 Nice classes: 16, 35, 38, 41 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: INDOOR Application No.: WO 732 680 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/WO 732 680 Nice classes: 11, 20, 21, 24, 27, 35 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: hollywood ROCK Application No.: M-94-2216 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-94-2216 Nice classes: 38, 41 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: HOLLYWOOD LIGHTS Application No.: M-93-2319 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2319 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: HOLLYWOOD CHEWING GUM Application No.: WO 488 792 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 488 792 Nice classes: 3, 4, 12, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 33, 34, 38, 41, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: HOLLYWOOD Application No.: M-92-1077 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-1077 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: hollywood Application No.: M-92-1076 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-1076 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: HOHES C Application No.: WO 653 247 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 653 247 Nice classes: 29, 30, 32 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: GOTIŅA Application No.: M-97-1976 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/ M-97-1976 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: GORI Application No.: M-93-94 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-94 Nice classes: 1, 2, 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Generating Power – Transmitting Possibilities Application No.: WO 747 903 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)3, LPZ/99 6.(1)4, LPZ/99 6.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/WO 747 903 Nice classes: 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: FRAGILE Application No.: WO 707 245 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2001/WO 707 245 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: FLORIDA Application No.: M-92-580 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-580 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: FILET-O-FISH Application No.: M-92-1777 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-1777 Nice classes: 29, 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: FAIRFAX Application No.: M-92-582 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-582 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: EURO ACTIV Application No.: WO 634 822 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 634 822 Nice classes: 1, 9, 16, 37, 40, 41, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ENTERPRISE Application No.: M-93-8149 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/M-93-8149 Nice classes: 39, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: e Enterprise Application No.: M-95-1481 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-95-1481 Nice classes: 12, 35, 37, 39 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ELIDA HAIR INSTITUTE PARIS Application No.: WO 650 313 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/WO 650 313 Nice classes: 3, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: EDELSTOFF Application No.: M-92-2338 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-2338 Nice classes: 32 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Diascope Application No.: WO 763 273 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2003/WO 763 273 Nice classes: 9 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: DIANETICS Application No.: M-93-2767 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2767 Nice classes: 16, 41, 42 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: DENVER Application No.: M-93-2314 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2314 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: DENVER Application No.: M-92-581 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-581 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: DALLAS Application No.: WO 634 805 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/WO 634 805 Nice classes: 25 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Creme 21 Application No.: M-92-789 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-789 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: CONFISERIE Application No.: M-98-1799 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-98-1799 Nice classes: 29 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: COMMERZBANK Application No.: WO 560 141 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 560 141 Nice classes: 36 First Instance Court Decision: C-1123/2/1997 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision: PAC-477/1997 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā)

Trademark: CLASSIC Application No.: M-00-282 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/M-00-282 Nice classes: 6, 9 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: CAPRI Application No.: M-92-1071 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-1071 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: CANALSATELLITE Application No.: WO 661 865 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1999/WO 661 865 Nice classes: 9, 16, 38, 41 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Butter Blend Application No.: M-93-7502 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-7502 Nice classes: 29 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Buffalo Application No.: WO 669 747 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 669 747 Nice classes: 25 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BROOKLYN Chewing Gum Gustolungo Application No.: WO 633 971 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 633 971 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BROOKLYN BY PERFETTI MADE IN ITALY Application No.: M-92-2400 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2400 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BROOKLYN Application No.: M-92-2399 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2399 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BROOKFIELD Application No.: M-92-4248 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-4248 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BOSTON Application No.: M-92-570 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-570 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BORKUM RIFF Application No.: M-92-594 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-594 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BOHEMIAN Application No.: M-93-2309 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2309 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BOHEMIA BRAND BEER Application No.: M-93-1585 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-1585 Nice classes: 32 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BOHEMIA Application No.: M-93-1582 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-1582 Nice classes: 32 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BLEND OF SWEDEN Application No.: M-92-915 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-915 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BIG DUTCHMAN Application No.: M-92-2341 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-2341 Nice classes: 6, 7, 9, 11, 19, 20, 21 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BEST-HALL Application No.: M-96-1202 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)6, LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-96-1202 Nice classes: 6, 19 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BERLINE Application No.: WO 665 816 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 665 816 Nice classes: 18 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BELMONT Application No.: M-93-2313 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2313 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BALTIC PULP Application No.: WO 743 073 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/99 6.(1)2, LPZ/99 6.(1)3 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2002/WO 743 073 Nice classes: 1 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: BACTERIOSTAT Application No.: M-97-2226 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5, LPZ/93 2.(1)7 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-97-2226 Nice classes: 1, 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: Australian by L'ALPINA Application No.: WO 580 742 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 580 742 Nice classes: 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 24, 25, 28 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ASPIRIN Application No.: M-93-2217 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-2217 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: C-1176/2/1998 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision: PAC-14/1999 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā)

Trademark: ASPIRIN Application No.: M-93-2216 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)5 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1997/M-93-2216 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: C-1176/2/1998 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision: PAC-14/1999 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā)

Trademark: ARIZONA Application No.: WO 669 646 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1998/WO 669 646 Nice classes: 12 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: AOK Application No.: M-92-790 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-790 Nice classes: 3, 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ANTIFLU Application No.: M-98-248 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/M-98-248 Nice classes: 5 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ALPEN Application No.: M-93-7995 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-7995 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ADRIA EXPORT Application No.: M-92-4245 Result: partially satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)7, LPZ/93 2.(2) Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-4245 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ACTIV Application No.: M-92-835 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-835 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: ABC Application No.: M-92-2163 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2163 Nice classes: 5, 10 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: 8 X 4 Application No.: M-92-2161 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1, LPZ/93 2.(1)6 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-92-2161 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: 1001 Application No.: M-93-2785 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/M-93-2785 Nice classes: 3 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: (taisnstūris ar slīpām svītrām) Application No.: M-92-536 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1995/M-92-536 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: C-1366/2/1996 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision: PAC-103/1997 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā)

Trademark: (rāmis ar nošķeltiem stūriem) Application No.: WO 704 859 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 704 859 Nice classes: 9, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 28, 30 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: (rāmis ar nošķeltiem stūriem) Application No.: WO 701 461 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 701 461 Nice classes: 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: (līkne) Application No.: WO 632 345 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/1996/WO 632 345 Nice classes: 33 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: (čaulīte) Application No.: WO 637 409 Result: refused Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2001/WO 637 409 Nice classes: 30 First Instance Court Decision: C-1564/2/2002 (ApP lēmums atstāts spēkā) Second Instance Court Decision:

Trademark: (cigarešu kārbiņa) Application No.: WO 688 990 Result: satisfied Grounds of Decision: LPZ/93 2.(1)1 Decision of the Board of Appeal: ApP/2000/WO 688 990 Nice classes: 16, 34 First Instance Court Decision: Second Instance Court Decision: